The Intricacies of UK Political Dynamics and Brexit

Despite the Brexit referendum results, many major UK political parties have now reversed their stance and expressed opposition to Brexit. This divergence in ideological positions raises questions about the integrity of these parties and their commitment to representing the interests of the electorate. It's crucial to analyze why they are taking such positions and whether it truly aligns with the public will.

Why Political Parties Should Follow the Referendum Result

When health professionals provide a diagnosis and treatment plan, the public often listens to their advice, regardless of their personal beliefs. Similarly, when major political parties agree to hold a referendum, the outcome should be respected. This is particularly true as these parties were instrumental in organizing the referendum. The point of the referendum was to give the public a democratic voice, and it would be misleading to ignore the result.

The Dangers of Political Backwardness

When political parties refuse to follow the public's clear and expressed will, they risk losing public trust and support. If a General Practitioner (GP) were to disregard expert medical advice and instead rely solely on the opinion of a non-expert, serious consequences would likely follow. In the context of Brexit, political parties that oppose Brexit in the face of a clear public mandate could face severe consequences, as illustrated in the hypothetical scenario with the GP and cancer treatment.

The Reasons for Major Parties' Opposition

Major political parties, including both the Conservative and opposition parties, have been against Brexit for their own strategic reasons. This opposition is not about pandering to the majority; it is about maintaining their political influence and power. The strategies employed by political leaders, such as Prime Minister Theresa May's 'No deal is better than a bad deal' mantra, have often been used to create a false sense of security among the electorate. Conversely, Boris Johnson's 'Get Brexit Done' slogan was used to mask the very same deal, which resulted in little change and an extended period of uncertainty.

Theresa May's defense deal has been criticized as a sell-out, which raises concerns about the security and defense capabilities of the UK. Despite her promises about defense, her actions have been seen as detrimental to the country's long-term security interests. Similarly, Boris Johnson has been silent on defense matters, and MPs have shown a lack of concern for this critical area. These omissions are concerning, especially as defense and security are fundamental aspects of a nation's well-being.

Critical Analysis of Current Policies

According to Lieutenant-General Johnathon Riley, the Conservative Women’s web series, 'How May’s Defense Deal Sells Us Down the River', has highlighted the detrimental effects of the current defense policy. The defense and security aspects of Brexit have been overlooked and are now being seriously undermined. The failure to secure a robust defense deal at the time of the referendum and subsequent lack of action on defense issues highlight a potential crises-in-the-making for the country.

Conclusion

It is clear that major political parties in the UK have their own agendas, which can lead to policies that do not necessarily reflect the collective will of the public. Regardless of party beliefs, the best interest of the country lies in following the referendum results and ensuring that the public's voice is respected. The consequences of ignoring the public's clearly expressed wish could lead to significant trust issues and potential harm to the nation's future.

It is essential for major political parties to prioritize the interests of the country and the will of the people over their own partisan agendas. In doing so, they can maintain public trust and ensure a stable and secure future for the United Kingdom.