Why General George Patton Slapped a Soldier Suffering from Battle Fatigue (PTSD)

The Historical Context and Background: "Battle Fatigue," as it was known, is what we would now describe as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Prior to World War I, such an episode was often described as hysteria. In the early 1900s, a standard treatment for hysteria involved a sound slap. This method was recognized as effective in bringing the sufferer out of their bout of distress and restoring composure.

The Evolution of Understanding PTSD

It is important to understand the evolution of our understanding of PTSD over the years. During World War I, many soldiers suffering from battle fatigue were, tragically, put before firing squads. This decision was a reflection of the limited understanding and treatment options available at the time. By World War II, while treatment methods had become somewhat more humane, the understanding of PTSD remained limited.

General Patton's Practice

General George Patton, a well-known and fiercely disciplined military leader, demonstrated his own experience with physical discipline. Growing up, he may have received the same type of treatment for his own episodes of hysteria. As a result, when he encountered soldiers suffering from battle fatigue, it is understandable that he would resort to similar methods.

There are reports that Patton slapped a soldier suffering from battle fatigue on multiple occasions under similar circumstances. Patton, a man known for his strict discipline and clear command, likely believed that physical discipline could help break the cycle of distress. While it is clear that this method was not always effective, it reflects the prevailing beliefs of the time.

Understanding the Psychological Process

Today, with the benefit of historical and psychological research, we can analyze the psychological process that the pre-Freudian doctors of the early 1900s were unable to fully grasp. The impact of a physical slap on a combat-fatigued soldier is complex and multifaceted, potentially including a release of pent-up frustration, a brief disruption of the self-sustaining loop of distress, and a temporary increase in alertness.

Personal Perspectives and Reflections

As someone who has experienced similar distress, I will testify that a physical slap is far better than a firing squad. While Patton's intentions were undoubtedly good and his methods well-meaning, it is crucial to understand the context of the times. General Patton was, indeed, a man to follow. His leadership and commitment to his troops were greatly admired.

Conclusion

Although the historical treatment methods may seem less effective in today's psychological landscape, it is crucial to understand the context of the times. General Patton's actions, while misguided by modern standards, were rooted in his own personal experiences and the prevailing medical knowledge of the early 1900s.

Today, we have a more nuanced and evidence-based approach to treating PTSD. However, it is essential to remember the past and honor those who lived through and practiced the methods of their time.