Uncomplete LGBT Characters in Movies and TV Shows: A Critique of Shallow Representations

Often, the inclusion of LGBT characters in films and TV shows is seen as a positive move towards diversity and normalization. However, this practice is not always devoid of issues. When these characters are added primarily as a box to be checked, they often end up being uncomplete and superficial, rather than nuanced and deeply developed individuals. Let's explore the reasons behind this phenomenon and analyze how it affects the quality and reception of these characters.

Reasons for Adding LGBT Characters

The primary reasons behind the inclusion of LGBT characters in media often revolve around two core motivations. The first is the desire to meet diversity quotas, which can lead to an authentic and genuine attempt to represent the vast spectrum of LGBTQ experiences. The second is the intentional efforts to 'normalize' the LGBTQ community within society, which can be both beneficial and problematic in different contexts.

Formulaic Diversity and Shallow Characters

When diversity is approached as a formula, the quality of the end product can suffer. This is particularly true when the diversity is superficial and not authentically rooted in the lived experiences of the characters. In such cases, the characters may appear to fit a certain quota but fail to add any meaningful or insightful dimension to the plot or the story.

These characters are often added to cater to a targeted demographic or to align with an ideological stance on diversity. For instance, if a production company is targeting an audience that values diversity, they might simply add characters to fit the diversity standards without much consideration for character depth. This results in a highly formula-driven approach that prioritizes ticking off boxes over the actual quality and authenticity of the characters.

Intersectionality and Its Limitations

Intersectionality, a theory that examines how overlapping social identities determine experiences of discrimination and privilege, is often cited as an approach to understanding and representing diverse identities. However, this theory can also be limiting when applied to character development. Intersectionality views individuals as collections of various social identities rather than as complete, autonomous beings.

In practice, this can result in characters being defined solely by their intersectional identities, leading to flat, one-dimensional portrayals. For example, a character might be labelled as 'black trans-woman,' with no further exploration of their unique personality, values, or individual quirks. Such characterizations strip away the complexity that makes individuals unique.

Impact on Character Design and Personality

The limited focus on intersectional identities means that characters often lack depth in terms of personality, values, and behaviors. Stereotypes and negative traits are typically omitted to avoid offending any particular group, resulting in characters that are empty shells lacking any distinguishing characteristics. As a result, these characters can feel incomplete and lack the relatable qualities that audience members appreciate.

The homogenization of these characters also means that their personalities align closely with what is considered "good" within the ideology of intersectionality. Any deviation from what is deemed acceptable can be seen as a threat to the representation of the minority group. This creates a restrictive environment where characters can only hold certain beliefs and opinions, leading to a lack of authentic individuality and complexity.

Alternative Approaches to Character Development

To develop truly compelling and complete characters, creators must start with the individual first. By focusing on the unique aspects of each character, including their values, hobbies, and quirks, a more authentic and engaging portrayal can be achieved. Even when adding diverse characters, the essence of the story and the characters themselves should be the primary focus, not just the diversity goals.

While corporate drones and intersectional ideologists are the most common culprits, there are exceptions where competent writers and producers create well-rounded characters. Protagonists or antagonists often benefit from more thoughtful development, but the bulk of the characters might still suffer from shallow or uncomplete portrayals.

Conclusion

The shallow portrayal of LGBT characters in movies and TV shows is often a result of a formulaic approach to diversity and a restrictive application of intersectionality. While the intention to represent diverse groups is positive, the method can lead to uncomplete and unengaging characters. By shifting focus to the individuality of each character, creators can craft more authentic and compelling stories that resonate with a broader audience. This approach ensures that diversity is not merely a checkbox but a meaningful and genuine part of the narrative.

Related Keywords

Intersectionality Diversity in media LGBT representation