Trumponomics and the Art of the ’Big Lie’

Cross your fingers and hope to die, Donald Trump has long embraced a rhetorical strategy that resonates eerily with one of history’s most notorious figures: Adolf Hitler. The phrase “Big Lie” may be tossed around casually, but its origins and impact must be understood. This article delves into the origins of the “Big Lie,” how it is used effectively in modern political discourse, and the concerns it raises in light of its application by former US President Donald Trump.

Origins of the "Big Lie"

The concept of the “Big Lie” is not new. In fact, it was Adolf Hitler who laid out the foundation for this technique. In his book Mein Kampf, Hitler elaborated on the idea that the repetition and insistence of a lie, no matter how outrageous, can render it believable. The theory is grounded in the idea that repeated statements, even if they are not true, can be believed if they are often enough.

A Violent History and a Cunning Political Tool

Hitler’s adoption and implementation of the “Big Lie” began with his imprisonment after a failed Nazi putsch in Germany in 1923. While in prison, he wrote many chapters of Mein Kampf. Upon his release, he continued to use these ideas effectively, leading to a rise from prisoner to Chancellor in just nine years. A significant part of his plan was to divert responsibility for Germany’s economic and social problems onto the Jewish population. This form of propaganda culminated in the Holocaust and a systematic campaign of misinformation.

The Resurgence of the "Big Lie" in Modern Politics

Donald Trump has become the face of contemporary politics where the “Big Lie” has found fertile ground. His campaign, presidency, and ongoing activities have seen countless instances where he has employed this tactic to advance his own narrative. The phrase “election fraud” has become a central theme in Trump’s rhetoric. He has repeatedly and emphatically stated that the 2020 election was rigged, even when there is no credible evidence to support such claims. This persistent and unfounded assertion has led many to question the veracity of the democratic process and raised ethical and legal concerns.

The Role of the Media and Public Perception

The “Big Lie” is not only about repetition; it is also about control. Trump has strategically leveraged the media and social platforms to disseminate his narratives, often in a format that is impossible to disprove due to its sheer audacity. He has consistently denied any wrongdoing and refused to accept the results of the election, making it difficult for the public perception to form an accurate understanding. This strategy has created a significant dissonance between fact and fiction, leading to a polarized public.

Personal Influences

A little-known fact is that Trump showed an early interest in literature that aligns with his political style. According to his first wife, Ivana Trump, and an article in Vanity Fair, he was deeply influenced by My New Order, a collection of Hitler’s speeches translated into English. This book was given to Trump by a friend named Marty Davis, who confirmed ownership. Trump, while admitting to owning the book, denied any study of these speeches, which he infamously poured wine down the back of the dress of the reporter, Marie Brenner, who wrote about his actions.

Implications and Ethics

The use of the “Big Lie” by Trump raises serious ethical and legal questions. It undermines democratic institutions, erodes trust in the media, and fosters hostility and division. For a democracy to function effectively, it must have transparency, accountability, and honesty. When these principles are compromised for political gain, the entire system is put at risk. The debate around the “Big Lie” is not merely academic; it has real-world consequences that affect the future of the nation and global trust in democratic processes.

Conclusion

The "Big Lie" technique is a dangerous and destructive tool that has been utilized by charismatic leaders throughout history, including Adolf Hitler and, unfortunately, Donald Trump. While the intentions and contexts may differ, the impacts are profoundly similar. As we move forward, it is crucial to recognize and challenge this rhetoric to protect the integrity of democratic processes and uphold the values that make a society just and equitable.