Understanding Time’s ‘Person of the Year’

Each year, Time magazine selects a 'Person (or Persons) of the Year' who has made a significant impact on the news and our lives, for good or ill. This choice reflects an individual or a group that embodies what is crucial about the year. What may come as a surprise to some is that the selection criteria do not necessarily require the honoree to be a 'good' or 'nice' person. In fact, the title is reserved for those who have had a substantial effect on global events, and this can extend to individuals with a darker legacy.

The Influence of Hitler in 1938

In 1938, Adolf Hitler was selected as the Time Person of the Year. Time magazine recognized Hitler as the most significant threatening force to the democratic freedom-loving world. The rise of the Third Reich under Hitler's leadership marked a turning point in world history, leading to escalating tensions and ultimately contributing to the outbreak of World War II. This selection underscores the critical impact of leaders who shape global events due to their ideologies and actions, regardless of whether they are deemed to be good or evil.

Stalin's Impact in 1939 and 1942

Two years later, in 1939, Joseph Stalin was chosen as the Time Person of the Year. His strategic decision to forge an alliance with Nazi Germany, despite the inherent risks, caused worldwide shock and dramatically altered the geopolitical landscape of Europe. This move allowed Hitler to steadily advance, leading to the outbreak of World War II. In 1942, Stalin was again deemed the Time Person of the Year for his crucial role in holding the Soviet Union together against the formidable German attack. His actions directly influenced the outcome of the war, preventing Hitler's ambition of European dominance from becoming a reality.

Implications and Broader Context

It is important to recognize that these selections do not suggest that the individuals have a positive impact. The 'Person of the Year' can equally reflect individuals whose actions have had a devastating effect on the world. Both Hitler and Stalin, who exhibit authoritarian traits and censor dissent, reflect a historical precedent where totalitarian leadership can influence global events dramatically. In this regard, their inclusion as 'Persons of the Year' serves as a cautionary tale about the consequences of such leadership.

The discourse around these figures persists, and it is worth reflecting on how historical narratives have evolved over time. Even during the early stages of the war, countries such as the United States made deals with Nazi Germany, indicating a complex and nuanced understanding of global politics during the era. The portrayal of these historical figures has shifted over the decades, with a firmer condemnation of their actions and ideologies.

Contemporary Reflections

Looking at these historical figures through a contemporary lens, it is worth noting that similar principles and tools of censorship and control can be seen in today's digital age. Social media platforms like Facebook's fact-checkers and the moderation practices on various online forums mirror the kind of control that dictators like Stalin and Hitler exercised over their societies. The impact of such powers is evident in the suppression of dissenting voices and the manipulation of information.

The term 'woke' has gained prominence, particularly in recent years. However, it is essential to understand that the concept of being woke about current events means staying informed and critical of the news presented by mainstream media. This includes recognizing the biases and censorship that may be present in the media, especially those aligned with political powers. In the case of Time's 'Person of the Year,' understanding the historical context and the true meaning of the title can offer valuable insights into the dynamics of global leadership and the impact of those in power.

By keeping a critical eye on the news and seeking diverse perspectives, one can stay ahead of the narratives crafted by those in positions of authority. As such, the story of Hitler and Stalin serves as a historical reminder of the need for vigilance and critical analysis in the face of authoritative figures who seek to shape the narrative.