The Tyrells During Robert's Rebellion: Were They Truly Betrayed Targaryens?

During the tumultuous period of Robert's Rebellion, the Tyrells stood as a critical path for the Targaryens' survival and eventual return to the Iron Throne. However, they were notably absent from the battlefield, choosing to 'bend the knee' to Robert Baratheon while Daemon Targaryen remained in exile. This decision, while it may seem a betrayal, was a strategic move to protect their interests. The Tyrells understood the complex political landscape and the potential risks involved in siding fully with either the Targaryens or the Lannisters and Baratheons. Let's delve into the details and explore the nuances of their actions.

Strength of Allegiance

Despite their initially committed stance to the Targaryens, evidence suggests that Ser Kevan Lannister’s comments about the Tyrells fighting "to the bitter end and beyond" may be overly simplistic. Records indicate a more intricate and equivocal approach from the Tyrells, especially in their actions during the crucial siege of Storm's End. Holding the Reach, an area roughly equivalent to modern-day Turkey, and their overall involvement in the rebellion suggest their commitment, albeit not unwavering.

In Mediation of Risk and Reward

The Tyrells' decision to remain at Storm's End was a masterful strategy that minimized their direct involvement in the war while maintaining their influence and potential rewards. The siege of Storm's End, although a significant event, did not impact the war's outcome. While the siege constrained Robert's forces and Stannis Baratheon, it did not provide the Targaryens with the military support they so desperately needed. The Tyrells' strategic positioning allowed them to pivot based on the war's progress:

Should the Targaryens win, the Tyrells could claim credit for the successful siege. If the Baratheons emerged victorious, the Tyrells could declare they had avoided significant engagement in the field, mitigating potential losses while still appearing loyal.

This dual stance reflects the Tyrells' strategic acumen, allowing them to navigate complex political waters without incurring significant losses or allegiance debt.

Beyond Robert's Rebellion

The Tyrells’ approach during Robert's Rebellion is part of a broader pattern of strategic behavior. Their involvement in the War of the Five Kings, particularly their timing in relieving King's Landing during the Battle of the Blackwater, demonstrates their ability to judge when it was advantageous to intervene.

During the Dance of the Dragons, their lord was an infant, leading them to maintain a neutral stance. In the Blackfyre Rebellions, they fought for the Targaryens but were not present at the decisive battle of Redgrass Field, further emphasizing their cautious approach to high-risk situations.

Conclusion: Betrayal or Strategic Pragmatism

While it is tempting to label the Tyrells' actions as betrayal, there is a strong argument for viewing them as a result of strategic pragmatism. By carefully balancing their allegiances and risks, the Tyrells ensured their survival and position of power in Westeros. Their actions underscore the complex political calculus required to navigate the turbulent waters of Westerosi politics, demonstrating that true loyalty is often a myth in a world where self-preservation is paramount.