The Heavy Interference Behind Blues Brothers 2000

Introduction

In the world of film sequels, perhaps none face as much scrutiny as the Blues Brothers 2000. Directed by John Landis, who many know for Ghostbusters, the sequel was met with mixed reviews and often cited as one of the worst in the franchise. Here, we delve into the behind-the-scenes story, focusing on the significant changes and the efforts to retain the original charm.

Origins of the Sequel

The idea for a Blues Brothers sequel first came to light in the mid-1990s. According to an article from the Los Angeles Times, Dan Aykroyd, one of the co-creators, had been opening up clubs called the House of Blues and performing with his band as Elwood Blues. These performances were incredibly popular, leading Aykroyd to call his former collaborator, John Landis, and suggest a reunion.

Unexpected Challenges

Landis, who had initially declined to direct the sequel, was eventually convinced by Aykroyd’s enthusiasm and the potential for a grand, lively performance in the film. However, once the screenplay was handed over and the production began, things took a turn.

Lady G. A Review of Committee Interference

It's the type of movie that happens at 3 AM after someone is pouring dollar bills through a hole in the ceiling and into a loud-and-loud bar, but they're just not quite the same movie anymore. In later interviews, Landis candidly admitted to feeling that the film had strayed from his initial vision. He was perturbed by the extensive meddling from various committees, who had significant say over the storyline and execution of the movie.

Landis lamented: They just began to meddle fantastically with it. The movie had a lot of heavy interference from some conservative-minded committees and people who had no understanding or knowledge of the original film. This led to a significant departure from the spirit of the original movie and its comedic essence.

Landis' Decision to Stay

Although he was against the costly meddling, Landis decided to stick with the project out of loyalty to Aykroyd. However, his decision came with its own set of challenges. Landis reflected on his situation: I never had that experience before where committees were telling me what they were going to do. What I should have done is quit but instead—out of loyalty to Dan—I finished the movie.

Despite his reservations, Landis remained committed to producing a film that would reflect the musical flair and hilarity that fans of the original had grown to love.

The Final Deliverance and Legacy

The film, released in 1998, was a mixed bag. While the Blues Brothers 2000 received praise for its music and, oddly, the fart jokes, it remained far from the enthusiastic reception of its predecessor. These elements made it distinct from its original, leading to a divided fanbase.

Landis, reflecting on the film, stated: We had fabulous music—I'm proud of the music—but by the time we were shooting, the movie was fucked. The experience was riddled with frustration, but his dedication to the original vision left a lasting impact on the Blues Brothers legacy.

Regardless of its critics, Blues Brothers 2000 serves as a testament to Landis' enduring passion for filmmaking and his unwavering loyalty to his former collaborator. Its legacy remains an interesting narrative in the world of sequels, showcasing the complexities that can arise from creative intervention and committee-driven decisions.

Conclusion

The story of Blues Brothers 2000 is a case study in the challenges faced when trying to maintain the essence of a beloved classic. As we reflect on the decisions made and the outcomes, it serves as a reminder of the importance of creative freedom in the pursuit of artistic vision.