Seinfeld of Doctor Who: Why Some Dislike Moffat’s Revelations
Seinfeld of Doctor Who: Why Some Dislike Moffat’s Revelations
As a Google SEO expert, it's important to explore the reasons behind popular opinions and discuss them with a comprehensive, engaging, and SEO-friendly approach. This article delves into the reasons why some fans of Doctor Who may not appreciate Moffat’s version of the show. We will explore the nuances of why this happened, the impact on the show, and some of the controversial decisions Moffat made during his tenure.
Why People May Dislike Moffat’s Version of Doctor Who
Not everyone enjoys Steven Moffat’s work on Doctor Who. Some viewers find his stories too confusing, with complex plot twists and disruptive character deaths. Others take issue with the frequent sexualization of female characters or the lack of natural endings for storylines. Despite these criticisms, it’s essential to note that Moffat’s departure was not due to firing but rather due to his decision to leave on his own accord.
Female Characters and Sexualization
One of the most notable criticisms of Moffat’s tenure is his portrayal of female characters. Some argue that he often sexualized female companions, which some fans found inappropriate. For instance, the character of River Song, who was introduced through a brutal and tragic death, later became a recurring character despite her initial fate. This inconsistency in how Moffat treated his female characters has been a point of contention.
Companion Endings and Plot Resurrection
Overshadowing the criticism of character sexualization, some fans complain about Moffat’s tendency to resurrect characters who had supposedly died. This inconsistency often left fans feeling cheated, as beloved companions like Donna Noble only appeared in episodes that Moffat wrote. The show’s narrative became increasingly complex and disjointed, leading to frustration among viewers.
Storyline Chicken Out and Character Deaths
A significant issue for some viewers was Moffat’s willingness to introduce a character and then kill them off quickly. This was exemplified in the introduction of River Song, where Moffat killed off the character and then brought her back in subsequent episodes. This inconsistency in storytelling often led to a feeling of unreliability and frustration. Additionally, when Moffat did kill a character, the manner in which they were resurrected often made the original death seem trivial and inconsequential.
Emotional Impact and Parting of Ways
For many fans, Moffat's writing style and decision-making had a profound emotional impact. It was evident in the death of Rory Williams, a character who was deeply loved by many fans. Moffat’s decision to kill Rory off through a painful and slow death was particularly difficult for some viewers to accept. Similarly, the death of Martha Jones and the 11th Doctor caused significant emotional distress among fans. These deaths, though ultimately not permanent, left a lasting impression on many viewers, leading to a tumultuous parting of ways with the show.
Comparison with Previous Showrunners
It’s worth noting the stark contrasts between Moffat and his predecessors. Doctors Who under Moffat was often criticized for being more erratic and less cohesive than under Russell T Davies (RTD). While some fans argue that RTD had his flaws, he also had a strong and distinct narrative voice. Some fans believe that RTD’s writing, though flawed, was more consistent and compelling. In contrast, Moffat’s work was seen as more unpredictable, leading to a sense of irritation among viewers who found it difficult to follow or enjoy.
Conclusion
Steven Moffat’s tenure as the showrunner of Doctor Who had its fair share of both praise and criticism. While he was able to introduce some engaging and complex storylines, his inconsistent approach to character development and storytelling left many fans feeling frustrated. Despite the challenges, Moffat’s impact on the show cannot be understated, and his work continues to be a topic of discussion and debate among Doctor Who fans.