Is Tyrion Lannister Illegally King in the North?

Many fans of the A Song of Ice and Fire series, particularly of the television adaptation Game of Thrones, often wonder whether Tyrion Lannister could claim the title of King in the North. However, examining the facts presents a rather different picture.

The Legal and Historical Context

Tyrion Lannister, the manipulative and cunning Hand of the King, has never technically held the title of King in the North. His marriage to Sansa Stark, considered by many to be a strategic alliance, was never consummated and hence, does not grant any legitimate claim to the North. In the world of A Song of Ice and Fire, a marriage is not just a union of hearts but also an exchange of titles and alliances, both of which were never fully realized between Tyrion and Sansa.

Reasons for No Claim

No Claim Based on Marriage:

Despite achieving the status of Hand of the King, Tyrion's marriage to Sansa was never fully consummated. In the world of Westeros, a marriage without consummation does not confer any legal rights or claims to titles or territories. Hence, Tyrion's status remains that of a Hand, rather than a contender for the throne in the North.

Marriage as a Farce:

Further, the marriage between Tyrion and Sansa was portrayed as a farce, orchestrated by Cersei as a tool for political leverage. In this sense, even if it were to be considered a legitimate union, it would serve more as a gesture of alliance than a true commitment. Additionally, Sansa is the rightful heir to the North, having proved her strength and leadership qualities through numerous trials and challenges.

The Iron Bank and Legal Claims

One might ask whether the Iron Bank could make a claim on the Lannister holdings or the north as a form of collateral for Cersei's borrowings. The Iron Bank is known for its strict dealings and its willingness to enforce its rights when necessary. If Cersei had indeed mortgaged the Lannister estates or the North as collateral, the Iron Bank could certainly make such a claim. However, the success of this claim would depend on what property the bank agreed as collateral and whether Cersei's debt remains unpaid.

Gender Roles and Titles

It is important to note the distinction between gender roles and titles in Westeros. Women whose husbands are kings are not automatically elevated to Queen status. This holds true for both male and female figures in the realm. For instance, Tyrion, holding a position of significant power, would more accurately be characterized as a Prince Consort to Sansa, rather than a King himself. Similarly, a Queen who deems her husband fits more fittingly as King Consort does not automatically become the King.

Understandably, a marriage to a man one despises would not result in a change of title. Even if Tyrion had taken the title of King Consort, Sansa's status as a Lady of the North and her rightful claim to the North would remain unchallenged. Her personal views and the traditions of the North would likely prevent such a title shift.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Tyrion Lannister is not illegitimately King in the North. His union with Sansa, while strategic, did not result in any form of legitimate claim to the North. Additionally, the actions of the Iron Bank would heavily depend on the specifics of their agreement with Cersei. The intrigue and power dynamics of Westeros mean that while interest may exist, practical outcomes must be considered within the established legal and social framework.