An Analysis of The Exorcist: Accurate or Inaccurate Portrayal of Exorcism

Is the 1973 horror classic, The Exorcist, an accurate portrayal of exorcism, or does it take creative liberties for the sake of cinematic tension? This article delves into the research and techniques behind the film's depiction of exorcism, analyzing whether the movie accurately reflects real-life practices or if it veers into the realms of fiction.

Laboring to Accurate Details

The director, William Friedkin, took immense care in portraying exorcism in The Exorcist. According to Friedkin, he researched everything he could find on real-life possessions and exorcisms. His approach ensured that the film included accounts and details that were actual cases from that time. Friedkin himself mentioned, "The Exorcist is based specifically on the Satanic cult activities of the time, and it is as close to reality as I could make it, using my imagination and experience as a director."

Research and Sources

Friedkin and screenwriter William Peter Blatty did extensive research, consulting with priests and exorcists. The film's authenticity is evident from the detailed rituals and practices depicted. Friedkin even consulted with the Bishop of the Catholic Diocese of Dallas, who had performed exorcisms, for accurate input. This indicates the film's intention to be as real as possible and not to rely on mere fictional imagination.

Professional Accolades and Analysis

Some critics and religious scholars have praised The Exorcist for its authenticity, while others have highlighted instances where the film may have taken creative liberties. Two prominent authors in the field of exorcism, The Satanic Experience author chaos magician Anton LaVey and The Scapegoat author Margerie porcella, have critiqued the film. However, both agree that the film provides a passable composite of various cases and serves as a "fundamentally accurate 'duck' of a film."

Exposing Inaccuracies

Anton LaVey pointed out that some exorcisms, such as that of Suzan Bailey in 1970, did not include such extreme physical manifestations as those seen in the film. Margerie porcella also noted that the duration of exorcisms is typically longer than the duration shown in the film. Such discrepancies show that while the film captures the essence of exorcism, it does not strictly adhere to every aspect of the practice.

Conclusion: A Blend of Fact and Fiction

Ultimately, The Exorcist can be seen as a blend of factual accounts and artistic liberties. While William Friedkin and his team strived to ground the film in reality, taking inspiration from various cases and consulting with experts, the film does take some creative liberties for dramatic effect. Nonetheless, it remains a powerful and thought-provoking portrayal of the practice of exorcism, initiating discussions between entertainment and the real world.